EN ↔ JP comparison · which version to grade
Grade the Japanese Charizard ex, or the English one?
Which to grade: Grade the English 199 if either — it is the only side with positive expected value, and even then only as a ~30% PSA 10 chase. The Japanese 201 is far cheaper to own, but its PSA 10 premium does not clear the ¥8,000 domestic grading fee in expectation. Under a likely PSA 9, skip both.
Side-by-side of the same card in both languages. Graded figures are recent sold medians (eBay); raw is the TCGplayer / market reference. Gem rates are labeled estimates. As of 2026-06-28. example/mock data
Pokémon Card 151 · #201 · UR
- Raw market
- ¥4,980
- PSA 10 sold
- ¥13,800 · 9 sold ↑
- Gem rate est.
- ≈ 60%
- Break-even
- ¥12,980
- PSA 10 premium
- 2.8× raw
- Expected value
- ¥-1,742
Probability-weighted value (¥11,238) doesn't beat raw + grading (¥12,980).
Full Japanese verdict →Source: recent eBay sold · raw market · as of 2026-06-28 · example/mock
Pokémon 151 · #199/165 · Special illustration rare
- Raw market
- $300
- PSA 10 sold
- $620 · 14 sold ↑
- Gem rate est.
- ≈ 30%
- Break-even
- $320
- PSA 10 premium
- 2.1× raw
- Expected value
- $88
Positive EV ($88) but it rides on a 30% top-grade rate — a chase, not a lock.
Full English verdict →Source: recent eBay sold · raw market · as of 2026-06-28 · example/mock
Run your own numbers — Japanese side
The cited answer above is static; this is the interactive tool for the Japanese print. The English side has its own calculator on its card page.
Run your own numbers
Estimates are editable — grading cost is never hardcoded into the verdict. example/mock data
Grade-probability distribution
≈ 6 of 10 reach 10Probability-weighted value (¥11,238) doesn't beat raw + grading (¥12,980).
Batch & timing
Sell-through time is a rough estimate from recent sold velocity — not a promise.